Bologna Center of the Johns Hopkins University SAIS
Conference Series in International Relations
|
“Overcoming the Iron Curtain
Visions of the End of the Cold War in Europe
1945-90”
|
Sorbonne, Paris June 12-14, 2008
|
Organized by the Universities of Paris I - Panthéon-Sorbonne and Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle in cooperation with Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt Stiftung, CIMA, LSE Cold War Studies Centre, and The Bologna Center of the Johns Hopkins University, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS)
|
For the call for papers, click here
|
The conference
|
The objective of the conference was to bring to the fore the reflections, programs and strategies which, throughout the period, have aimed at calling into question the bipolar system and at replacing it by alternative logic, approaches or concepts. These visions may be associated with individuals, whatever their role or function (say, a Kennan, a de Gaulle, a Brandt, a Reagan or a Gorbachev); of organized groups (e.g. political parties like the French RPF in the late 1940’s, or the German SPD and Eurocommunists in the 1970’s); or of civil society (as witnessed for example by the posture of Soviet or East European dissidents in the 1980’s). Alternatively, they may have been connected with certain processes (the European integration process, the CSCE) or certain events (e.g. the Euromissile crisis and the peace movement). Depending on the period and context, they may have constituted actual, thoroughly conceived programs, more blurred, utopian aspirations aiming at the reconciliation between the two halves of divided Europe, or even simply the belief that the cold war had already, in effect, come to an end (for instance after Stalin’s death or at the height of détente).
Such an effort is of interest for several reasons. Although the most outstanding visions of the end of the Cold War—especially those of prominent actors—have caught the attention of historians, the conference hopefully brought to the fore previously neglected aspects, approaches or representatives of the problem and thus enhance our general knowledge of the overall phenomenon. Moreover, while specific visions of the end of the Cold War have been treated on their own merits and in their particular contexts, the effort aimed to make it possible to apprehend them as a whole, thus allowing for a more systematic questioning of the very notion of “anticipating” the end of the Cold War throughout the period (e.g. by allowing typologies). Finally, the effort revealed a lot about the nature, the structure and the multiple perceptions of the Cold War itself. Because they were elaborated in particular contexts and, in fact, in opposition to these situations, the various visions of the end of the Cold War were treated as yardsticks which made it possible to better appreciate these same contexts or situations and, therefore, to better analyze the dynamics of the conflict and the dialectics between status quo and change throughout the period—thus further contributing to the understanding of its end.
|
The draft program
Thursday, June 12
13:45 – 18:00
|
| 13:45 |
Opening Remarks
|
Frédéric Bozo, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris III, and Marie-Pierre Rey, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne.
Pierre Rey, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne.
|
| 14:00-15:00 |
False Endings and Counterfactuals |
Chair: Frédéric Bozo, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris III, and Marie-Pierre Rey, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne.
Why was the End of the Cold War not anticipated?
Michael Cox, London School of Economics
The Uses and Limits of IR Theory in Explaining the End of the Cold War
Mark Kramer, Harvard University
Comments and discussion by Pierre Hassner, Sciences-Po Paris, and discussion
|
| 15:00-16.00 |
Crystallizing the Cold War |
Chair: Frédéric Bozo, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris III, and Marie-Pierre Rey, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne.
George F. Kennan: “A Gaullist Before de Gaulle”
John L. Harper, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS Bologna Center
The Bilderberg Group and the End of the Cold War: the Disengagement Debate in the 1950s
Thomas W. Gijswijt, University of Heidelberg
Comments by Irwin Wall, University of California, and discussion
|
| 16:00-16:30 |
Coffee Break |
| |
| 16:30-18:00 |
Stalin’s Death and After: A Missed Opportunity? |
Chair: Marie-Pierre Rey, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne
The Soviet Campaign to End the Cold War, 1953-1955
Geoffrey Roberts, University College, Cork
Stalin’s Death and Anglo-American Visions of Ending the Cold War, 1953
Jaclyn Stanke, Campbell University, Bueis Creek, NC
“The dawn of communism is rising above the planet!”
Public visions of the end of the Cold War and Soviet intellectual elites after Stalin’s Death
Vladislav Zubok, Temple University
Comments by Christian Ostermann, Cold War International History Program, Washington, and discussion (tbc)
|
| 20:00 |
Dinner |
| |
|
Friday, June 13
9:15-18:00
|
| |
| 9:15-10:45 |
Theoretical Visions |
Chair: Michael Cox, London School of Economics
Realist Theory and the End of the Cold War: Morgenthau, Aron and Waltz
Marco Cesa, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS Bologna Center
Liberal International Theory and Imagining the End of the Cold War
Joseph M. Grieco, Duke University
Look for the Blind Spot Where Structural Realism Meets Path Dependence
Erik Jones, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS Bologna Center
Comments by Jean-Yves Haine, SIPRI, Stockholm, and discussion
|
| 10:45-11:15 |
Coffee Break |
| |
| 11:15-12:15 |
Alternative Visions of the 1960s |
Chair: Leopoldo Nuti, Università di Roma Tre
Towards a New Concert: De Gaulle’s Vision of post-Cold War a Europe
Garret Martin, George Washington University
Franz Josef Strauß and the End of the Cold War
Ronald Granieri, University of Pennsylvania
Comments by Maurice Vaïsse, Sciences-Po Paris, and discussion
|
| 12:30-14:00 |
Lunch |
| |
| 14:00-15:00 |
A Helsinki Vision? |
Chair: N. Piers Ludlow, LSE
A Very British Vision of Détente: The UK’s Foreign Policy during the Helsinki Process
Martin D. Brown, Richmond: The American International University in London
Attempting to End the Cold War: The EC Nine and the Helsinki CSCE
Angela Romano, University of Florence
Comments by Svetlana Savranskaya, NSA, Washington, and discussion
|
| 15:00-17:00 |
Visions and Dissent in the 1970s |
Chair: N. Piers Ludlow, LSE
The Liberal and Democratic Peace Theory: From Brandt’s Ostpolitik to Political Sciences of the 1990s
Gottfried Niedhart, University of Mannheim
Neither in one bloc, nor in the other: Berlinguer and the PCI in Eastern and Western Perceptions
Laura Fasanaro, University of Roma Tre
Jirí Hájek and the CSCE Appeal of the Charter 77
Christian Domnitz, Institute of European History, Mainz
|
| 15:45-16:15 |
Coffee Break |
| Comments by Odd Arne Westad, London School of Economics, and discussion |
| |
| 17:00-18:00 |
Vision or Status Quo in the 1970s |
Chair: Robert Frank, Université de Paris I Panthéon Sorbonne
A Split Personality? Henry Kissinger and the “End” of the Cold War
Thomas A. Schwartz, Vanderbilt University
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing and his vision of the end of the Cold War
Georges-Henri Soutou, Université de Paris Sorbonne – Paris IV
Comments by Olav Njøtlstad, The Norwegian Nobel Institute, and discussion
|
| 20:00 |
Dinner |
Keynote Speaker: Andrei Grachev, the Gorbachev Foundation, Moscow
|
Saturday, June 14
9:30-11:30
|
| 9:30-13:00 |
Evolutionary visions and unexpected results in the 1980s |
Chair: Marco Cesa, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS Bologna Center
Solidarnosc: Ending the Cold War, Unintentionally
Gregory F. Domber, Stanford University
Common Security as a Way to Overcome the (second) Cold War: Willy Brandt’s Strategy for Peace in the 1980s
Bernd Rother, Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt Stiftung, Berlin
Which socialism after the Cold War? Gorbachev’s vision and its impact on the Western European left
Marie-Pierre Rey, Université Paris I-Panthéon Sorbonne
Comments by Andrei Grachev, the Gorbatchev Foundation, Moscow, and discussion
|
| 11:00-11:30 |
Coffee Break |
| |
Chair: Bernd Rother, Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt Stiftung, Berlin
Thatcher’s Double Track Road to the End of the Cold War: Merging Liberalization and Preservation
Ilaria Poggiolini, University of Pavia
Mitterrand’s Vision and the End of the Cold War
Frédéric Bozo, Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris III
Visions of Ending the Cold War: Triumphalism and U.S. Soviet Policy in the 1980s
Beth A. Fischer, University of Toronto
Nuclear Arms Control and Visions of the End of the Cold War i the 1980s
Leopoldo Nuti and Marilena Gala, Università di Roma Tre (tbc)
Comments by Tom Blanton, NSA, Washington, and discussion
|
| 13:15 |
Farewell Reception |